<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deliberating as to whether AJAX is actually a future-proof term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ssims.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/deliberating-as-to-whether-ajax-is-actually-a-future-proof-term/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ssims.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/deliberating-as-to-whether-ajax-is-actually-a-future-proof-term/</link>
	<description>Software, Computing and Web technology discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssims</title>
		<link>http://blog.ssims.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/deliberating-as-to-whether-ajax-is-actually-a-future-proof-term/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>ssims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ssims.co.uk/?p=348#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I realised after posting this that many RIA platforms do use XML as a method of pushing data between client and server in the form of a JavaScript XML HttpRequest. However I still believe my point is valid: The issue is that with today&#039;s sophisticated RIA platforms the programmer of the application and the user very rarely directly manipulate the JavaScript itself directly. Therefore the AJAX terminology has little meaning in such circumstances - it is purely a matter of opinion but I believe one need not list the technologies made use of to implement a certain pattern of working - particularly if this is to potentially change or become obsolete. 

To draw a comparison it is a bit like calling an application that uses SQL to talk to a relational database an &#039;SQL application&#039;. It would be better termed a database linked application, or simply an application - even though SQL is an established solid standard for communicating with databases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realised after posting this that many RIA platforms do use XML as a method of pushing data between client and server in the form of a JavaScript XML HttpRequest. However I still believe my point is valid: The issue is that with today&#8217;s sophisticated RIA platforms the programmer of the application and the user very rarely directly manipulate the JavaScript itself directly. Therefore the AJAX terminology has little meaning in such circumstances &#8211; it is purely a matter of opinion but I believe one need not list the technologies made use of to implement a certain pattern of working &#8211; particularly if this is to potentially change or become obsolete. </p>
<p>To draw a comparison it is a bit like calling an application that uses SQL to talk to a relational database an &#8216;SQL application&#8217;. It would be better termed a database linked application, or simply an application &#8211; even though SQL is an established solid standard for communicating with databases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

